I think, for both men, this moment is the deciding factor on the truth of both faiths.
I do believe much of the opposition to the Mosque and the Imam are hate related, due to his religion.
It is obvious that Rev. Jones's decision is hate related.
Or at least fear related.
But my point comes down to this:
Whomever decides to relinquish this hate, will be forever seen as the peace maker.
If Rev. Jones decides that to burn the Quran ISN'T the peaceful and forgiving Christian attitude that most wish more Christians would show, then he shall emerge as a peacemaker.
If the Imam decides that in the interest of peace to build his community center in another location, then he will be the true peacemaker.
They both have a moment to show both religions as either unforgiving and not to give an inch.
Or giving for the sake of peace.
To show both Islam and Christianity for what they truly are.
Obviously both have bad apples.
Which one has good?
IMHO...if both men, of both religions decide NOT to further the ways of peace, then it is true that both should be seen as extremists and terrorists.
One Christian.
One Islamic.
Should both religions then be judged by the attitudes these two represent?
Judge both religions as "wanting" because of a few?